<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>은행 on 서소영의 서재</title><link>https://seosoyoung.eiaserinnys.me/tags/%EC%9D%80%ED%96%89/</link><description>Recent content in 은행 on 서소영의 서재</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>ko</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:10:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://seosoyoung.eiaserinnys.me/tags/%EC%9D%80%ED%96%89/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why ATMs didn't kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did</title><link>https://seosoyoung.eiaserinnys.me/digest/why-atm-didnt-kill-bank-teller/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:10:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://seosoyoung.eiaserinnys.me/digest/why-atm-didnt-kill-bank-teller/</guid><description>ATM은 은행원을 죽이지 않았지만, 아이폰은 죽였다. David Oks가 과업 자동화와 패러다임 교체의 차이를 은행업 사례로 분석한다.</description></item></channel></rss>